Orthopaedic Medical Group of Tampa Bay/Stuart A. Goldsmith, P.A. v. Agency for Health Care Administration

957 So. 2d 18, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 5191, 2007 WL 1038114
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 9, 2007·No. No. 1D06-1658·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final order of the Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA). In that order, AHCA re-characterized numerous findings of fact by the administrative law judge (ALJ) as conclusions of law and rejected them. AHCA’s purported rationale for doing so was its determination that the appellant’s expert witness on Medicaid coding was not competent to give such testimony. The determination of a witness’s qualifications to express an expert opinion is within the discretion of the ALJ and will not be reversed absent a showing of clear error. Cf. Dorta-Duque v. Dorta-Duque, 791 So.2d 1148, 1150 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (quoting Ramirez v. State, 542 So.2d 352, 355 (Fla.1989)). AHCA failed to establish that the ALJ’s determination constituted clear error. Therefore, we REVERSE and REMAND with instructions to AHCA to enter a final order in accordance with the ALJ’s recommended order.

ALLEN, WEBSTER, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orthopaedic Medical Group of Tampa Bay/Stuart A. Goldsmith, P.A. v. Agency for Health Care Administration, 957 So. 2d 18, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 5191, 2007 WL 1038114 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

957 So. 2d 18 (Orthopaedic Medical Group of Tampa Bay/Stuart A. Goldsmith, P.A. v. Agency for Health Care Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ramirez v. State
542 So. 2d 352 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Dorta-Duque v. Dorta-Duque
791 So. 2d 1148 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)