Orthodontic Centers of Texas, Inc. v. Charles Corwin, D.D.S. and Charles Corwin, D.D.S., P.C.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 11, 2005
Docket13-05-00327-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Orthodontic Centers of Texas, Inc. v. Charles Corwin, D.D.S. and Charles Corwin, D.D.S., P.C. (Orthodontic Centers of Texas, Inc. v. Charles Corwin, D.D.S. and Charles Corwin, D.D.S., P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Orthodontic Centers of Texas, Inc. v. Charles Corwin, D.D.S. and Charles Corwin, D.D.S., P.C., (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

                             NUMBER 13-05-327-CV

                         COURT OF APPEALS

               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

ORTHODONTIC CENTERS OF TEXAS, INC.,                  Appellant,

                                           v.

CHARLES CORWIN, D.D.S. AND

CHARLES CORWIN, D.D.S., P.C.,                              Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________

                  On appeal from the 329th District Court

                           of Wharton County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

                  Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, ORTHODONTIC CENTERS OF TEXAS, INC., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 329th District Court of Wharton County, Texas, in cause number 39,714-5.  After the record was filed, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.  Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  Appellant=s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 11th day of August, 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Orthodontic Centers of Texas, Inc. v. Charles Corwin, D.D.S. and Charles Corwin, D.D.S., P.C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orthodontic-centers-of-texas-inc-v-charles-corwin--texapp-2005.