Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc. v. Miles Inc.

48 F.3d 1237, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25644, 1995 WL 74663
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedFebruary 15, 1995
Docket95-1092
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 48 F.3d 1237 (Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc. v. Miles Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc. v. Miles Inc., 48 F.3d 1237, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25644, 1995 WL 74663 (Fed. Cir. 1995).

Opinion

48 F.3d 1237
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.

ORTHO DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MILES INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-1092.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 15, 1995.

S.D.N.Y., 865 F.Supp. 1073.

DISMISSED.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed.R.App.P. 42(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yurman Design, Inc. v. Paj, Inc.
93 F. Supp. 2d 449 (S.D. New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 F.3d 1237, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25644, 1995 WL 74663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ortho-diagnostic-systems-inc-v-miles-inc-cafc-1995.