Orth v. . Kaesche
118 N.E. 1072, 222 N.Y. 612, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1493
Opinion
-Judgment affirmed, with costs, on ground that there was evidence to sustain the finding of the Appellate Division that the assignments of plaintiffs were obtained by misstatements and false representation; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Hogan, Cardozo, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Orth v. . Kaesche, 118 N.E. 1072, 222 N.Y. 612, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1493 (N.Y. 1918).
118 N.E. 1072 (Orth v. . Kaesche) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of Wing
162 Misc. 551 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1937)
Chase Nat. Bank of New York v. Sayles
11 F.2d 948 (First Circuit, 1926)
In re the Estate of Thompson
116 Misc. 453 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1921)