Ortez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Ortez v. State

262 S.W. 1118, 98 Tex. Crim. 117, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 506

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ortez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 101 Tex. Crim. 471 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 28, 1924·No. No. 8451.·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— The offense is the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of one year.

The State’s testimony, if believed, is sufficient to show that' the appellant committed the offense charged.

No bills of exception are found bringing forward for review any rulings of the trial court. The motion for new trial raises no questions which can be reviewed save the sufficiency of the evidence.

The indictment seems regular. We discern nothing in the record requiring or justifying a reversal of the judgment. An affirmance is ordered.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— The offense is the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of one year.

The State’s testimony, if believed, is sufficient to show that' the appellant committed the offense charged.

No bills of exception are found bringing forward for review any rulings of the trial court. The motion for new trial raises no questions which can be reviewed save the sufficiency of the evidence.

The indictment seems regular. We discern nothing in the record requiring or justifying a reversal of the judgment. An affirmance is ordered.

Affirmed.

Ortez v. State, 262 S.W. 1118, 98 Tex. Crim. 117, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 506 (Tex. 1924).

Pincite

262 S.W. 1118 (Ortez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.