Ortega v. Santomassimo

District Court, S.D. California·Decided March 23, 2023·No. 3:22-cv-01795·Unknown

Opinion

TIM EDWARD ORTEGA, Case No.: 22cv1795-GPC(DDL)

Plaintiff, JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF v. DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE MICHAEL P. SANTOMASSIMO; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendants.

On November 16, 2022, Barbara-Susan, as next friend to Plaintiff Tim Edward Ortega, signed and filed a “petition for declaratory judgment and record.” (Dkt. No. 1.) Plaintiff did not sign the complaint. (See id.) Because a non-attorney has no authority to appear as an attorney for others, even with a power of attorney, on January 23, 2023, the Court sua sponte dismissed the complaint with leave to file an amended complaint signed by Plaintiff on or before February 17, 2023. (Dkt. No. 14.) The Court warned that if an amended complaint is not filed by the deadline, the Court will dismiss the action with prejudice. (Id.) Because more than 30 days have passed, and Plaintiff, himself, has not signed and filed an amended complaint, the Court DISMISSES the action with prejudice for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with a court order.! See Lynch v. City of Alhambra, 880 F.2d 1122, 1124 (9th Cir. 1989) (following dismissal without prejudice of complaint, the plaintiff's failure to cure the deficiencies of the complaint within the period provided by the district court converted the dismissal into a final, appealable with- prejudice dismissal); Ferguson v. Pagati, No. CV 12—00653—VBF-DTB, 2013 WL 3989426, at *2 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2013) (“If plaintiff fails timely to file a second amended complaint, the dismissal will be converted to a with-prejudice dismissal due to of prosecution and failure to comply with court order.”). Dated: March 23, 2023 (2. (0 1] Hon. Gonzalo P. Curtel United States District Judge cc: Tim Edward Ortega 11718 SE Federal Highway, #435 Hobe Sound, FL 33455 ' The Court notes that Barbara-Susan has attempted to make two filings entitled “Petition for Declaratory Judgment and Record” and “Petition to Preserve Evidence” which have been rejected by discrepancy orders because she is not a party to the case and the filings are missing the signature of Plaintiff Tim Ortega. (See Dkt. Nos. 20, 23.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ortega v. Santomassimo, (S.D. Cal. 2023).

Ortega v. Santomassimo (Ortega v. Santomassimo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related