Ortega v. Kimble

District Court, D. Arizona·Decided June 28, 2021·No. 2:21-cv-00765·Unknown

Opinion

1 WO MH 2 3 4 5 8 9 Aaron James Ortega, No. CV 21-00765-PHX-MTL (MTM) 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER 12 J. Kimble, et al., 13 Defendants.

14 15 On April 30, 2021, Plaintiff Aaron James Ortega, who is confined in the Arizona 16 State Prison Complex-Lewis, filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 17 § 1983, an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, and a Motion for Court Order. In a 18 May 7, 2021 Order, the Court denied the Application to Proceed as deficient, denied the 19 Motion for Court Order, and gave Plaintiff 30 days to file a complete Application to 20 Proceed In Forma Pauperis that included a certified six-month trust account statement. 21 On May 13, 2021, Plaintiff filed a “Motion for Order to Provide Certification of 22 Trust Account, 2nd Request,” which the Court denied in a May 26, 2021 Order. The Court 23 gave Plaintiff 30 days from the filing date of that Order to pay the filing and administrative 24 fees or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month 25 trust account statement. 26 On June 2, 2021, Plaintiff filed an Application to Proceed In Forma 27 Pauperis (Doc. 9) and a Declaration in Support of the Application (“First Declaration”). 28 On June 4, 2021, Plaintiff filed a Second Declaration in Support of the Application 1 (“Second Declaration”). On June 10, 2021, he filed a Motion for Verification (Doc. 12). 2 The Court will deny the Application to Proceed and Motion for Verification and will give 3 Plaintiff 30 days to either pay the filing and administrative fees or file a complete 4 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account 5 statement. 6 I. Payment of Filing Fee 7 When bringing an action, a prisoner must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and a 8 $52.00 administrative fee in a lump sum or, if granted the privilege of proceeding in forma 9 pauperis, pay the $350.00 filing fee incrementally as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). 10 An application to proceed in forma pauperis requires an affidavit of indigence and a 11 certified copy of the inmate’s trust account statement for the six months preceding the filing 12 of the Complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). An inmate must submit statements from each 13 institution where the inmate was confined during the six-month period. Id. To assist 14 prisoners in meeting these requirements, the Court requires use of a form application. 15 LRCiv 3.4. 16 If a prisoner is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court will assess an 17 initial partial filing fee of 20% of either the average monthly deposits or the average 18 monthly balance in Plaintiff’s account, whichever is greater. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). An 19 initial partial filing fee will only be collected when funds exist. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4). 20 The balance of the $350.00 filing fee will be collected in monthly payments of 20% of the 21 preceding month’s income credited to an inmate’s account, each time the amount in the 22 account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). 23 II. Application Fails to Comply with Statute 24 Plaintiff has used the court-approved form, but the “Certificate of Correctional 25 Official as to Status of Applicant’s Trust Account” section is not completed, and Plaintiff 26 has again failed to submit a certified six-month trust account statement. In light of these 27 deficiencies, the Court will deny the Application to Proceed. 28 . . . . 1 III. Declarations 2 In his First Declaration, Plaintiff states that he is unaware of his inmate trust account 3 balance and that his attempts to obtain certification of his trust account balance have been 4 unsuccessful. In his Second Declaration, Plaintiff states that his trust account balance was 5 $1,400.90 as of May 28, 2021, and that he has requested remittal of a $402.00 payment for 6 the filing and administrative fees in this case by submitting an inmate letter to Correctional 7 Officer III Santian with an attached “Inmate Request for Withdrawal-External” form. 8 The Court has not received any payment, and it is not clear whether Plaintiff 9 submitted his request in accordance with the Arizona Department of Corrections policy 10 governing requests for external disbursements, Department Order (DO) 905.3.2.6.1 11 Accordingly, the Court will grant Plaintiff an additional 30 days from the filing date of this 12 Order to either pay the filing and administrative fees or file a complete Application to 13 Proceed In Forma Pauperis and submit a certified six-month trust account statement. 14 IV. Motion for Verification 15 In his Motion for Verification, Plaintiff complains that the e-filing receipts he was 16 provided for Documents 9 and 10 (his most recent Application to Proceed and his First 17 Declaration) omitted the docket entry text, which typically appears on e-filing receipts. 18 Plaintiff requests an order requiring the Arizona Department of Corrections to provide him 19 a “full and Complete – Authentic and unaltered copy” of the e-filing receipts for 20 Documents 9 and 10. 21 There is no indication that these omissions were intentional, and Plaintiff was not 22 deprived of any relevant information as a result—the text for these docket entries merely 23 contained the title of the documents that were filed. Accordingly, the Court will deny the 24 Motion for Verification. The Clerk of Court will be directed to send Plaintiff a copy of the 25 docket for his records. 26 . . . . 27

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ortega v. Kimble, (D. Ariz. 2021).

Ortega v. Kimble (Ortega v. Kimble) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, Sheriff
963 F.2d 1258 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)