Ortega v. Gonzalez

266 A.D.2d 92, 698 N.Y.S.2d 476, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11670

This text of 266 A.D.2d 92 (Ortega v. Gonzalez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ortega v. Gonzalez, 266 A.D.2d 92, 698 N.Y.S.2d 476, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11670 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.), entered January 8, 1999, which denied defendants-appellants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as barred by the exclusive remedy of workers’ compensation, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly determined that defendants-appellants had not sustained their burden, as movants for summary judgment (see, Ferrante v American Lung Assn., 90 NY2d 623, 630), of establishing the absence of triable issues of fact concerning workers’ compensation coverage. Concur — Tom, J. P., Andrias, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ferrante v. American Lung Ass'n
687 N.E.2d 1308 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 A.D.2d 92, 698 N.Y.S.2d 476, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ortega-v-gonzalez-nyappdiv-1999.