Ortega-Lozano v. State
920 So. 2d 809, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2027, 2006 WL 358657
Opinion
Jorge Ortega-Lozano challenges the trial court’s order summarily denying, as untimely, his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Although we conclude that Ortega-Lozano’s motion was timely filed, see Chagoya v. State, 817 So.2d 1039 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), we affirm the denial order because Ortega-Lozano cannot demonstrate prejudice.
See Pena v. State, 837 So.2d 495 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Prieto v. State, 824 So.2d 924 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ortega-Lozano v. State, 920 So. 2d 809, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2027, 2006 WL 358657 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
920 So. 2d 809 (Ortega-Lozano v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pena v. State
837 So. 2d 495 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Prieto v. State
824 So. 2d 924 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Chagoya v. State
817 So. 2d 1039 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)