Orta v. State

805 So. 2d 916, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15120, 2001 WL 1297495
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 26, 2001
DocketNo. 2D01-2976
StatusPublished

This text of 805 So. 2d 916 (Orta v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Orta v. State, 805 So. 2d 916, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15120, 2001 WL 1297495 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ross Orta appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion for jail time credit. Orta claimed that he is entitled to credit for 267 days spent in jail prior to sentencing, rather than the 216 days he received. The trial court denied the motion after determining that Orta was entitled to 247 days of jail time credit. It directed that Orta’s sentence be corrected to reflect 247 days of credit. Because the trial court did not attach any documents to its order, this court cannot determine whether the order was correct. See Barnard v. State, 782 So.2d 458 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

Reversed and remanded.

BLUE, C.J., and DAVIS and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barnard v. State
782 So. 2d 458 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
805 So. 2d 916, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15120, 2001 WL 1297495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orta-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.