Orta-Rosario v. Wexford Health Sources

19 F. App'x 305
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 13, 2001
DocketNo. 99-1454
StatusPublished

This text of 19 F. App'x 305 (Orta-Rosario v. Wexford Health Sources) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Orta-Rosario v. Wexford Health Sources, 19 F. App'x 305 (6th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

[306]*306OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Porfirio Orta-Rosario appeals from the district court’s entry of summary judgment against him on his state and federal-law claims against appellee Wexford Health Sources for wrongful discharge, discrimination, harassment and a violation of Michigan’s Whistleblowers’ Protection Act. Having reviewed Orta-Rosario’s arguments and applicable case law, we conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of Wexford Health Sources. Accordingly, we hereby affirm the district court’s judgment for the reasons set forth in its opinion of March 9,1999.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 F. App'x 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orta-rosario-v-wexford-health-sources-ca6-2001.