Ort v. Ort

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ort v. Ort

652 S.W.2d 184, 1983 Mo. App. LEXIS 3253

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 12, 1983

DocketNo. 45437

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 652 S.W.2d 184 (Ort v. Ort) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ort v. Ort, 652 S.W.2d 184, 1983 Mo. App. LEXIS 3253 (Mo. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

CRIST, Judge.

Marriage dissolution after eight years, both parties 55 years of age and having been previously married. Husband appeals. We affirm.

Husband complains about a $500.00 monthly maintenance award to wife. Wife is physically disabled, marginally educated and marginally trained. She has not worked for several years. Husband had a take home pay from employment of approximately $1,300.00. Our reading of the transcript convinces us the trial court followed the guidelines of § 452.335, RSMo.1978. Bull v. Bull, 634 S.W.2d 228, 229 (Mo.App.1982).

Husband also complains about the division of marital property. Husband does not show great disparity in the division of marital property. Our reading of the transcript convinces us the division of property was just and in accordance with § 452.330, RSMo.1978. Nilges v. Nilges, 610 S.W.2d 58 (Mo.App.1980) and Madden v. Madden, 585 S.W.2d 220 (Mo.App.1979).

The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.

Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI