Orston v. Allstate Insurance Co.

502 So. 2d 526, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 555, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6835
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 17, 1987·No. No. 86-1367·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final declaratory judgment under review is affirmed upon a holding that there is no liability coverage for the death of the insured’s wife [Cecil Diamond] due to the negligence of the deceased insured husband [Herbert R. Diamond] under the subject insurance policy issued by Allstate Insurance Company based on the family exclusion clause in the policy. We conclude that the said exclusion clause is fully applicable to bar insurance coverage for the death of the insured’s spouse, even though both the insured husband and his spouse are deceased. See Reid v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 352 So.2d 1172 (Fla. 1977); Linehan v. Alkhabbaz, 398 So.2d 989 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Newman v. National Indem. Co., 245 So.2d 118 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971); see also Cameron Mut. Ins. Co. v. Dilbeck, 637 S.W.2d 363 (Mo.Ct.App. 1982).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orston v. Allstate Insurance Co., 502 So. 2d 526, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 555, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6835 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

502 So. 2d 526 (Orston v. Allstate Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chrysler Credit Corp. v. United Services Automobile Ass'n
625 So. 2d 69 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Chrysler v. UNITED SERV. AUTO. ASS'N
625 So. 2d 69 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Government Emp. Ins. Co. v. Fitzgibbon
568 So. 2d 113 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)