Orston v. Allstate Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Orston v. Allstate Insurance Co.

502 So. 2d 526, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 555, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6835

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 17, 1987

DocketNo. 86-1367

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 502 So. 2d 526 (Orston v. Allstate Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Orston v. Allstate Insurance Co., 502 So. 2d 526, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 555, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6835 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final declaratory judgment under review is affirmed upon a holding that there is no liability coverage for the death of the insured’s wife [Cecil Diamond] due to the negligence of the deceased insured husband [Herbert R. Diamond] under the subject insurance policy issued by Allstate Insurance Company based on the family exclusion clause in the policy. We conclude that the said exclusion clause is fully applicable to bar insurance coverage for the death of the insured’s spouse, even though both the insured husband and his spouse are deceased. See Reid v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 352 So.2d 1172 (Fla. 1977); Linehan v. Alkhabbaz, 398 So.2d 989 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Newman v. National Indem. Co., 245 So.2d 118 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971); see also Cameron Mut. Ins. Co. v. Dilbeck, 637 S.W.2d 363 (Mo.Ct.App. 1982).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The final declaratory judgment under review is affirmed upon a holding that there is no liability coverage for the death of the insured’s wife [Cecil Diamond] due to the negligence of the deceased insured husband [Herbert R. Diamond] under the subject insurance policy issued by Allstate Insurance Company based on the family exclusion clause in the policy. We conclude that the said exclusion clause is fully applicable to bar insurance coverage for the death of the insured’s spouse, even though both the insured husband and his spouse are deceased. See Reid v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 352 So.2d 1172 (Fla. 1977); Linehan v. Alkhabbaz, 398 So.2d 989 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Newman v. National Indem. Co., 245 So.2d 118 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971); see also Cameron Mut. Ins. Co. v. Dilbeck, 637 S.W.2d 363 (Mo.Ct.App. 1982).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

502 So. 2d 526, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 555, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orston-v-allstate-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack