Orshan v. Anker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Orshan v. Anker

74 A.D.2d 865, 426 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10644

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 17, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 74 A.D.2d 865 (Orshan v. Anker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Orshan v. Anker, 74 A.D.2d 865, 426 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10644 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding [866]*866pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel respondent to (1) expunge the unsatisfactory rating issued to petitioner and (2) reinstate petitioner as an academic high school principal, with back pay and other benefits, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered August 15, 1978, which, inter alia, remitted the matter to respondent "for a de novo 105a proceeding upon petitioner’s request for same”. Permission for the taking of this appeal is hereby granted by Mr. Justice Hopkins. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Morton at Special Term. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding [866]*866pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel respondent to (1) expunge the unsatisfactory rating issued to petitioner and (2) reinstate petitioner as an academic high school principal, with back pay and other benefits, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered August 15, 1978, which, inter alia, remitted the matter to respondent "for a de novo 105a proceeding upon petitioner’s request for same”. Permission for the taking of this appeal is hereby granted by Mr. Justice Hopkins. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Morton at Special Term. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 A.D.2d 865, 426 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orshan-v-anker-nyappdiv-1980.