Orrin Realty Corp. v. Addyman

235 A.D. 732

This text of 235 A.D. 732 (Orrin Realty Corp. v. Addyman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Orrin Realty Corp. v. Addyman, 235 A.D. 732 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Order granting, on reargument, application for a [733]*733peremptory mandamus order unanimously affirmed on the law, with costs to the respondent. This case differs from the case of Matter of McCoy v. Apgar (241 N. Y. 71). In that ease the board of trustees of the village of PeeksHll had been given express legislative authority to grant permits for gasoline stations in village streets. No such authority has been given the village of Ardsley, and, in our opinion, subdivision 46 of section 89 of the Village Law* does not confer such power. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of McCoy v. Apgar
148 N.E. 793 (New York Court of Appeals, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orrin-realty-corp-v-addyman-nyappdiv-1932.