Orrick Nero v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: December 22, 2004
• Docket: 06-04-00081-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-04-00081-CR

ORRICK NERO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

---

On Appeal from the 114th Judicial District Court

Smith County, Texas

Trial Court No. 241-1710-03

---

Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter

MEMORANDUM OPINION

            On March 5, 2004, Orrick Nero pled guilty to possession of cocaine in an amount greater than 200 grams but less than 400 grams, a first degree felony. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.115(a), (e) (Vernon 2003). There was no negotiated plea agreement in this case; instead, Nero submitted the issue of punishment to the trial court's discretion.

            The trial court accepted Nero's plea, heard evidence and argument regarding punishment, and then sentenced Nero to thirty years' imprisonment. Following the pronouncement of the sentence, Nero signed a document titled "WAIVER OF MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL AND MOTION IN ARREST OF JUDGMENT AND WAIVER OF RIGHT TO APPEAL," which he submitted to the trial court. Nero states in his waiver, "That he does not wish to appeal his conviction[,] and expressly waives his right to appeal." Nero also orally waived his right to appeal before the trial court. And the trial court's certification reflects Nero waived his right to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

            A criminal defendant may waive many rights, including one's right to appeal. Walton v. State, 92 S.W.3d 845, 846 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2002, no pet.). "A knowing and intelligent waiver of the right to appeal is binding on the defendant and prevents him from appealing any issue in the cause without the consent of the court." Id. "The proper disposition of such a case is not a dismissal for want of jurisdiction, because the waiver does not affect our jurisdiction. Rather, it prevents the defendant from bringing the appeal." Id.

            Accordingly, we dismiss Nero's appeal.

                                                                        Jack Carter

                                                                        Justice

Date Submitted:          December 21, 2004

Date Decided:             December 22, 2004

Do Not Publish

          We affirm the judgment.

Date Submitted:          January 6, 2005

Date Decided:             January 7, 2005