Orren v. Iowa Mutual Liability Insurance

54 S.E.2d 927, 230 N.C. 618, 1949 N.C. LEXIS 395
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 21, 1949
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 54 S.E.2d 927 (Orren v. Iowa Mutual Liability Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Orren v. Iowa Mutual Liability Insurance, 54 S.E.2d 927, 230 N.C. 618, 1949 N.C. LEXIS 395 (N.C. 1949).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Tbe determinate question at issue herein is as to whether tbe diamond ring was possessed by plaintiff or a member of bis family for personal use or as a business asset held for sale. If a business .asset, its loss by tbeft was not insured. Tbe findings and conclusion of tbe judge in respect thereto were adverse to plaintiff. They are fully .sustained by tbe record. Hence tbe judgment entered must be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co v. Quirt
346 A.2d 497 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1975)
American Motorists Insurance v. Vermont
155 S.E.2d 675 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 S.E.2d 927, 230 N.C. 618, 1949 N.C. LEXIS 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orren-v-iowa-mutual-liability-insurance-nc-1949.