Orren v. Iowa Mutual Liability Insurance
This text of 54 S.E.2d 927 (Orren v. Iowa Mutual Liability Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tbe determinate question at issue herein is as to whether tbe diamond ring was possessed by plaintiff or a member of bis family for personal use or as a business asset held for sale. If a business .asset, its loss by tbeft was not insured. Tbe findings and conclusion of tbe judge in respect thereto were adverse to plaintiff. They are fully .sustained by tbe record. Hence tbe judgment entered must be
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 S.E.2d 927, 230 N.C. 618, 1949 N.C. LEXIS 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orren-v-iowa-mutual-liability-insurance-nc-1949.