Orr v. Tribble

S.D. Georgia

Orr v. Tribble

158 F. 897, 1907 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40

District Court, S.D. Georgia·Decided December 20, 1907·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SPEER, District Judge,

(after stating the facts as above). The report of the special master, Arthur H. Codington, Esq., is a clear and accurate statement of the law on this topic. The attorneys for the plaintiff state that they have no exception to his findings. It will therefore be ordered that the finding of the master be made the judgment of this court, that the property be remanded to the officer of the city court of Forsyth, and that the rule against the defendants be discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SPEER, District Judge,

(after stating the facts as above). The report of the special master, Arthur H. Codington, Esq., is a clear and accurate statement of the law on this topic. The attorneys for the plaintiff state that they have no exception to his findings. It will therefore be ordered that the finding of the master be made the judgment of this court, that the property be remanded to the officer of the city court of Forsyth, and that the rule against the defendants be discharged.

Orr v. Tribble, 158 F. 897, 1907 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40 (S.D. Ga. 1907).

Pincite

158 F. 897 (Orr v. Tribble) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related