Orr v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Orr v. State

861 S.W.2d 638, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1116, 1993 WL 268398

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 20, 1993·No. No. 63089·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm. The judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears; an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm. The judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears; an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Orr v. State, 861 S.W.2d 638, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1116, 1993 WL 268398 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

861 S.W.2d 638 (Orr v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.