Orr v. Schackel

5 Ohio N.P. 246
CourtCourt of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County
DecidedFebruary 15, 1896
StatusPublished

This text of 5 Ohio N.P. 246 (Orr v. Schackel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Orr v. Schackel, 5 Ohio N.P. 246 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1896).

Opinion

SPIEGEL, J.:

Petition in error granted. Cause dismissed at cost of defendant in error, because Justice had no jurisdiction. Sec. 584, par. 4, must be construed together with sec. 583, par. 7, and sec. 582, and thus construing it, a Justice can only obtain jurisdiction over a non-resident of his township in a civil action, where the order to attach property accompanying the summons is made effective by attachment of the property; otherwise, [247]*247not. Paine’s Lessees v. Moreland, 15 Ohio, 435; Cooper v. Reynolds, 10 Wall., 308; Work, Jurisdiction, p. 45.

Wm. R. Collins, for plaintiff in error. P. E. Friend, for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cooper v. Reynolds
77 U.S. 308 (Supreme Court, 1870)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Ohio N.P. 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orr-v-schackel-ohctcomplhamilt-1896.