Orr v. Randolph

CourtSuperior Court of Maine
DecidedOctober 3, 2017
DocketANDap-17-09
StatusUnpublished

This text of Orr v. Randolph (Orr v. Randolph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Orr v. Randolph, (Me. Super. Ct. 2017).

Opinion

( (

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT ANDROSCOGGIN, ss. CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. AP-17-09 WILLIAM ORR, ) ) Appellee ) OCT 3 '17 AMll:24 ) ANDRO SUPERIOR COUR. V. ) ) ORDER JOHN RANDOLPH, ) ) Appellant. ) ) )

Before the Court is Appellant John Randolph's appeal of district court civil action

pursuant to 76G of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure.

I. Background

On May 3, 2017, following Appellant's failure to appear in an action filed against

him, default judgment was entered in the Lewiston District Court, Docket No. LEWDC­

SC-2017-00179. On June 1, 2017, Appellant filed a motion to set aside default and relief

from judgment pursuant to Maine Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b ). So as not to waive his

right to appeal, on June 1, 2017, Appellant also filed a notice of appeal to this court.

Pursuant to Maine Rule of Appellate Procedure 3(b ), by handwritten order dated June

19, 2017, the District Court judge declined to rule on Appellant's Rule 60(b) motion

pending disposition of the appeal in this court.

II. Discussion

Maine Rule of Small Claims Procedure ll(a) authorizes an appeal from a judgment

of the District Court in a small claims action to the Superior Court pursuant to Maine

Rule of Civil Procedure 76D. However, once a default judgment has been entered, a party

who has not previously appeared cannot obtain direct appellate review of the court's

exercise of discretion in entering a default judgment and must instead pursue relief under

1 of 2 \.

/ ' Rule 60(b) before the trial court. Richter v. Ercolini, 2010 ME 38,

404. Therefore, because the District Court has not yet considered Appellant's Rule 60(b)

motion, this case is not ripe for appeal. As requested by Appellant, this Court will stay

this appeal and remand to the District Court for consideration of Appellant's Rule 60(b)

motion.

IV. Conclusion

This Court STAYS Appellee's Rule 76G Appeal and REMANDS this case to the

District Court for consideration of Appellant's motion to set aside default and relief from

judgment pursuant to Maine Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b ).

The Clerk is directed to incorporate this Order into the docket by reference

pursuant to Maine Rule of Civil Procedure 79(a).

Dated: /Q/ 3/;'] (+--=(.....,,_.....~­ - f - -," " ' ­

2 of 2 Date Filed 6-20-17 Androscoggin County Docket No. AP-17-9

Action : Small Claims Appeal

William Orr vs . Arthur Randolph 32 Kerri Farms Drive Standish, ME 04084

Plaintiff's Attorney Defendant's Attorney

Prose John Conway, Esq.

Date of Entry

June 20 Received 06-20-17: Notice of Appeal Small Claims filed. Notice is hereby given that the Defendant appeals to the Superior Court from the Judgment entered in this action on May 3, 2017.

July 17 On 07-17-17: Notice and Briefing Schedule filed . Petitioner Brief is due on or before August 28, 2017. Copies to parties.

July 31 Received '07-31-17: Respondent's Opposition for Requested Appeal filed .

Aug 28 Received 08-28-17: Appellant's Brief filed .

Aug 31 Received 08-31-17: Requested Appeal of John Randolph be denied filed .

Sept 12 Received 09-7-17: Appellee's Brief and Opposition for Requested Appeal filed .

Sept 21 Received 09-21-17: Appellant's Response to Opposition to Requested Appeal filed .

Oct 3 Received 10-3-17: Order filed . (Kennedy, J.) The Court STAYS Appellee's Rule 76G Appeal and REMANDS this case to the District Court for consideration of Appellant's motion to set aside default and relief From judgment pursuant to Maine Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Copies to parties.

Oct 3 On 10-03-17: All original paperwork sent to the Maine District Court.

Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richter v. Ercolini
2010 ME 38 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Orr v. Randolph, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orr-v-randolph-mesuperct-2017.