Orr v. Long Island Railroad
This text of 234 A.D. 790 (Orr v. Long Island Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event, upon the ground that there is no substantial difference between the present record and that before us on the previous appeal, when we decided (231 App. Div. 763) that the evidence presented questions of fact for submission to the jury, and it necessarily results that the motion to dismiss the complaint should not have been granted. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper and Davis, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., concurs although adhering to his views indicated on the prior appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 A.D. 790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orr-v-long-island-railroad-nyappdiv-1931.