Orr v. Colt Co.

132 S.E. 144, 35 Ga. App. 204, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 634
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 3, 1926
Docket17018
StatusPublished

This text of 132 S.E. 144 (Orr v. Colt Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Orr v. Colt Co., 132 S.E. 144, 35 Ga. App. 204, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 634 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and none of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial show reversible error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concw.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 S.E. 144, 35 Ga. App. 204, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orr-v-colt-co-gactapp-1926.