Orr v. Amory

11 Mass. 25
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 15, 1814·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

It has been heretofore settled, that the assignees of bankrupts, duly appointed under the laws of a foreign country, cannot maintain actions, in their own- names, in our courts, for demands due to such bankrupts, (a) A chose in action, such as is the subject of the present action, is not assignable at the common law, nor by any statute provision recognized in this commonwealth, where the remedy is sought to be maintained. The contract of Birnie if Rockendorff with the defendant is not to be [ * 26 ] varied in its import * and effect by a voluntary assign rnent on their part. The action is not maintained.

Plaintiffs nonsuit.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orr v. Amory, 11 Mass. 25 (Mass. 1814).

11 Mass. 25 (Orr v. Amory) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baxter National Bank v. Talbot
13 L.R.A. 52 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1891)
Fisk v. Brackett
32 Vt. 798 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1860)
J. B. Kirkland & Co. v. Lowe, Pattison & Co.
33 Miss. 423 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1857)
Fall River Iron Works Co. v. Croade & Trustee
32 Mass. 11 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1833)
Brush v. Curtis
4 Conn. 312 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1822)