Orr & Rolfe Co. v. Merrill

98 A. 303, 78 N.H. 175, 1916 N.H. LEXIS 27
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedMay 2, 1916
StatusPublished

This text of 98 A. 303 (Orr & Rolfe Co. v. Merrill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Orr & Rolfe Co. v. Merrill, 98 A. 303, 78 N.H. 175, 1916 N.H. LEXIS 27 (N.H. 1916).

Opinion

Young, J.

The question raised by the wife’s exception is whether she is liable on a contract she made with the plaintiffs for the benefit of a partnership composed of herself and her husband — not whether she would be liable on a contract her husband made for the benefit of the partnership. In other words, the question is not whether she is liable on a contract made by her husband, but on one she made with the plaintiffs, and that she is, is not open to question. P. S., c. 176, s. 2.

Exception overruled.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 A. 303, 78 N.H. 175, 1916 N.H. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orr-rolfe-co-v-merrill-nh-1916.