Orr (Addison) Vs. State

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ADDISON FRANKLIN ORR, No. 80206 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

FILED JAN 2 3 EL H A. DROY CLE PREISE COURT BY

DEPUTY CLET27.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from district court orders denying a motion to show cause; denying an application to proceed in forma pauperis; denying a motion for transportation of inmate for court appearance or, in the alternative, for appearance by telephone or video conference; denying a motion for full disclosure; denying an ex parte motion for appointment of counsel and request for evidentiary hearing; denying a motion to appoint counsel; denying a motion to produce; denying a motion for chain of custody; denying a motion for enlargement of time; and denying a motion to dismiss. Ninth Judicial District Court, Douglas County; Thomas W. Gregory, Judge.

This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect.

Specifically, no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order

zo- 03137

denying the aforementioned motions. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Parraguirre

4,42\ , J. , J.

Hardesty Cadish

cc: Hon. Thomas W. Gregory, District Judge Addison Franklin Orr Attorney General/Carson City Douglas County District Attorney/Minden Douglas County Clerk

SUPREME Gown'

OF NEVADA

10) 194IA 2