Orr (Addison) Vs. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided November 25, 2019·No. 79869·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ADDISON FRANKLIN ORR, No. 79869 Appellant,

vs. FILED THE STATE OF NEVADA,

Respondent. NOV 2 5 2019 ELZ?HA. BROWN CLERK OF SU i REME COURT BY 6.'4

DEprri

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion to compel. Ninth Judicial District Court, Douglas County; Thomas W. Gregory, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion to compel, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

, J.

Hardesty

AleL(bat..0 J. , J.

Stiglich Silver

cc: Hon. Thomas W. Gregory, District Judge Addison Franklin Orr Attorney General/Carson City Douglas County District Attorney/Minden SUPREME COURT Douglas County Clerk OF NEVADA

(0., 1947A 4120., 101-L03106

MEItti 111111

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orr (Addison) Vs. State, (Neb. 2019).

Orr (Addison) Vs. State (Orr (Addison) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)