Orozco v. U&I Group, Inc.
758 P.2d 894, 92 Or. App. 585, 1988 Ore. App. LEXIS 1338
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided August 17, 1988·No. WCB 85-10736; CA A46716·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The petition for review in this workers’ compensation case was filed on December 4, 1987. We therefore review for substantial evidence. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 752 P2d 312 (1988). The referee’s order and the Board’s order, which affirmed it without comment, are not adequate for judicial review. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., supra, 90 Or App at 205.
Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Orozco v. U&I Group, Inc., 758 P.2d 894, 92 Or. App. 585, 1988 Ore. App. LEXIS 1338 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).
758 P.2d 894 (Orozco v. U&I Group, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Orozco v. U & I Group, Inc.
798 P.2d 727 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1990)