Orozco v. U&I Group, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Orozco v. U&I Group, Inc.

758 P.2d 894, 92 Or. App. 585, 1988 Ore. App. LEXIS 1338

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedAugust 17, 1988

DocketWCB 85-10736; CA A46716

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 758 P.2d 894 (Orozco v. U&I Group, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Orozco v. U&I Group, Inc., 758 P.2d 894, 92 Or. App. 585, 1988 Ore. App. LEXIS 1338 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The petition for review in this workers’ compensation case was filed on December 4, 1987. We therefore review for substantial evidence. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 752 P2d 312 (1988). The referee’s order and the Board’s order, which affirmed it without comment, are not adequate for judicial review. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., supra, 90 Or App at 205.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

The petition for review in this workers’ compensation case was filed on December 4, 1987. We therefore review for substantial evidence. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 752 P2d 312 (1988). The referee’s order and the Board’s order, which affirmed it without comment, are not adequate for judicial review. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., supra, 90 Or App at 205.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

758 P.2d 894, 92 Or. App. 585, 1988 Ore. App. LEXIS 1338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orozco-v-ui-group-inc-orctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack