Orozco-Rosas v. Gonzales

Ninth Circuit

Orozco-Rosas v. Gonzales

176 F. App'x 905

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJuly 3, 2006

DocketNo. 05-76929

StatusPublished

This text of 176 F. App'x 905 (Orozco-Rosas v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Orozco-Rosas v. Gonzales, 176 F. App'x 905 (9th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Respondent’s unopposed motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction is granted. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003); Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 277 F.3d 1137, 1144 (9th Cir.2002).

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate. See Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004).

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Respondent’s unopposed motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction is granted. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003); Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 277 F.3d 1137, 1144 (9th Cir.2002).

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate. See Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004).

DISMISSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 F. App'x 905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orozco-rosas-v-gonzales-ca9-2006.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack