Orozco-Ramirez v. Holder
This text of 331 F. App'x 539 (Orozco-Ramirez v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Marvin R. Orozco-Ramirez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. Ordonez v. INS, 345 F.3d 777, 782 (9th Cir.2003). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Orozco’s motion to reopen because it was untimely. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). We lack jurisdiction to consider Orozco’s contention that the BIA should have equitably tolled the filing deadline because Orozco did not exhaust the contention before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
331 F. App'x 539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orozco-ramirez-v-holder-ca9-2009.