Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/Orozco-Orozco v. Lampert

Orozco-Orozco v. Lampert

1 P.3d 512, 167 Or. App. 515, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 814
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMay 24, 2000
Docket98-10-30079M; CA A106722
StatusPublished

This text of 1 P.3d 512 (Orozco-Orozco v. Lampert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Orozco-Orozco v. Lampert, 1 P.3d 512, 167 Or. App. 515, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 814 (Or. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Judgment requiring payment of court-appointed attorney fees vacated; otherwise affirmed. Alexander v. Johnson, 164 Or App 235, 990 P2d 929 (1999).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alexander v. Johnson
990 P.2d 929 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 P.3d 512, 167 Or. App. 515, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orozco-orozco-v-lampert-orctapp-2000.