O'Rourke v. Hanchett
This text of 35 N.Y.S. 328 (O'Rourke v. Hanchett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Although the record in this case contains no evidence of an absolute promise to pay, yet, if it did, it not appearing that such promise was made with full knowledge of the fact that the defendant had not been charged as indorser, it would be insufficient to create a liability. Meyer v. Hibsher, 47 N. Y. 265. The rule laid down in that case is as follows: “A promise, to work a waiver, must be made with full knowledge of all the facts.” The exceptions should be overruled, and judgment ordered upon the verdict, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 N.Y.S. 328, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 611, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orourke-v-hanchett-nysupct-1895.