O'Rourke v. Hanchett
35 N.Y.S. 328, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 611, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 717
Opinion
Although the record in this case contains no evidence of an absolute promise to pay, yet, if it did, it not appearing that such promise was made with full knowledge of the fact that the defendant had not been charged as indorser, it would be insufficient to create a liability. Meyer v. Hibsher, 47 N. Y. 265. The rule laid down in that case is as follows: “A promise, to work a waiver, must be made with full knowledge of all the facts.” The exceptions should be overruled, and judgment ordered upon the verdict, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
O'Rourke v. Hanchett, 35 N.Y.S. 328, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 611, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 717 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).
35 N.Y.S. 328 (O'Rourke v. Hanchett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Meyer v. . Hibsher
47 N.Y. 265 (New York Court of Appeals, 1872)