O'Rourke v. Hanchett

35 N.Y.S. 328, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 611, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 717
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 18, 1895
StatusPublished

This text of 35 N.Y.S. 328 (O'Rourke v. Hanchett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Rourke v. Hanchett, 35 N.Y.S. 328, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 611, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 717 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Although the record in this case contains no evidence of an absolute promise to pay, yet, if it did, it not appearing that such promise was made with full knowledge of the fact that the defendant had not been charged as indorser, it would be insufficient to create a liability. Meyer v. Hibsher, 47 N. Y. 265. The rule laid down in that case is as follows: “A promise, to work a waiver, must be made with full knowledge of all the facts.” The exceptions should be overruled, and judgment ordered upon the verdict, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meyer v. . Hibsher
47 N.Y. 265 (New York Court of Appeals, 1872)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 N.Y.S. 328, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 611, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orourke-v-hanchett-nysupct-1895.