O'Rourke v. Feist
This text of 53 N.Y.S. 1110 (O'Rourke v. Feist) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The case of Berg v. Parsons, 156 N. Y. 109, 50 N. E. 957, is not an authority adverse to the conclusions arrived at in the case of Randolph v. Feist, 23 Misc. Rep. 650, 52 N. Y. Supp. 109, which we consider controls the disposition of the case at bar. The facts on' which the former case rests are quite different from those in Randolph v. Feist, and in the present case, and the remarks of the judge, giving the opinion of the majority of the court of appeals, on which counsel for the appellant lays stress, are mere dicta, unnecessary to the decision of the case. The judgment must be affirmed, with costs. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 N.Y.S. 1110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orourke-v-feist-nyappterm-1898.