O'Rourke v. A. I. Namm & Son, Inc.
68 N.E.2d 61, 295 N.Y. 983, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1123
Opinion
Judgment of Appellate Division reversed and that of Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, on the ground that there was evidence of negligence proper to be submitted to the jury; no opinion.
Concur: Lotjghban, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacheb and Fuld, JJ. Taking no part: Dye, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
O'Rourke v. A. I. Namm & Son, Inc., 68 N.E.2d 61, 295 N.Y. 983, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1123 (N.Y. 1946).
68 N.E.2d 61 (O'Rourke v. A. I. Namm & Son, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Caputi v. Loblaw, Inc.
73 A.D.2d 1031 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
DeGeorge v. City of New York
51 A.D.2d 991 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)