O'Rourke v. A. I. Namm & Son, Inc.
68 N.E.2d 61, 295 N.Y. 983, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1123
This text of 68 N.E.2d 61 (O'Rourke v. A. I. Namm & Son, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
O'Rourke v. A. I. Namm & Son, Inc., 68 N.E.2d 61, 295 N.Y. 983, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1123 (N.Y. 1946).
Opinion
Judgment of Appellate Division reversed and that of Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, on the ground that there was evidence of negligence proper to be submitted to the jury; no opinion.
Concur: Lotjghban, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacheb and Fuld, JJ. Taking no part: Dye, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Caputi v. Loblaw, Inc.
73 A.D.2d 1031 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
DeGeorge v. City of New York
51 A.D.2d 991 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
68 N.E.2d 61, 295 N.Y. 983, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orourke-v-a-i-namm-son-inc-ny-1946.