Oropesa v. State
606 So. 2d 1289, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11441, 1992 WL 332637
Opinion
Finding a valid departure reason supported by the record, Scurry v. State, 489 So.2d 25 (Fla.1986), Rey v. State, 509 So.2d 1332 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), we affirm the appellant’s convictions and sentence. However, we remand for correction of the written sentence to comport with the trial court’s oral pronouncement at sentencing that the terms be served concurrently. Perez v. State, 498 So.2d 1005 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oropesa v. State, 606 So. 2d 1289, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11441, 1992 WL 332637 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
606 So. 2d 1289 (Oropesa v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Scurry v. State
489 So. 2d 25 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Perez v. State
498 So. 2d 1005 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Rey v. State
509 So. 2d 1332 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)