Oronzo v. Appeals Board of the Administrative Adjudication Bureau of the State Department of Motor Vehicles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Oronzo v. Appeals Board of the Administrative Adjudication Bureau of the State Department of Motor Vehicles

199 A.D.2d 225, 606 N.Y.S.2d 167

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 30, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 199 A.D.2d 225 (Oronzo v. Appeals Board of the Administrative Adjudication Bureau of the State Department of Motor Vehicles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oronzo v. Appeals Board of the Administrative Adjudication Bureau of the State Department of Motor Vehicles, 199 A.D.2d 225, 606 N.Y.S.2d 167 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination of respondent, Appeals [226]*226Board of the Administrative Adjudication Bureau of the Department of Motor Vehicles, dated March 18, 1992, which revoked petitioner’s driver’s license, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, Bronx County [Howard Silver, J.], entered June 3, 1992), is dismissed without costs and disbursements. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of respondents dismissing the petition.

Petitioner’s driver’s license was properly revoked upon a finding, supported by substantial evidence, that he drove 16 miles above the posted speed limit, his third such offense within 18 months. (See, People v Dusing, 5 NY2d 126, 128.) Moreover, the correct standard of proof of clear and convincing evidence was employed (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 227 [1]; see, Matter of Rosenthal v Hartnett, 36 NY2d 269). Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination of respondent, Appeals [226]*226Board of the Administrative Adjudication Bureau of the Department of Motor Vehicles, dated March 18, 1992, which revoked petitioner’s driver’s license, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, Bronx County [Howard Silver, J.], entered June 3, 1992), is dismissed without costs and disbursements. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of respondents dismissing the petition.

Petitioner’s driver’s license was properly revoked upon a finding, supported by substantial evidence, that he drove 16 miles above the posted speed limit, his third such offense within 18 months. (See, People v Dusing, 5 NY2d 126, 128.) Moreover, the correct standard of proof of clear and convincing evidence was employed (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 227 [1]; see, Matter of Rosenthal v Hartnett, 36 NY2d 269). Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 A.D.2d 225, 606 N.Y.S.2d 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oronzo-v-appeals-board-of-the-administrative-adjudication-bureau-of-the-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack