Oronoz v. Washoe County School District

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedMarch 5, 2025
Docket3:24-cv-00478
StatusUnknown

This text of Oronoz v. Washoe County School District (Oronoz v. Washoe County School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oronoz v. Washoe County School District, (D. Nev. 2025).

Opinion

1 || Sara K. Montalvo, Esq., Nev. Bar No. 11899 sara.montalvo@washoeschools.net 2 || Kevin A. Pick, Esq., Nev. Bar No. 11683 kevin.pick@washoeschools.net 3 || WASHOE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT P.O. Box 30425 4 || Reno, NV 89520-3425 Telephone: 775-348-0300 5 Fax: 775-333-6010 Attorneys for Defendant Washoe County School District 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

o 8 IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA ch 9 |} CRISTINA ORONOZ, CASE NO.: 3:24-cv-00478-MMD-CLB ak 10 Plaintiff, Ell Vs. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER © 12 || WASHOE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, and DOES I-X, 2 13 = Defendants. “R14 / 3 15 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 26(c), in order to protect the © 16 confidentiality of confidential information obtained by the Parties in connection with this case, ‘7 || the Parties hereby agree as follows: 8 Any Party or non-party may designate as “confidential” (by stamping the relevant page or 19 as otherwise set forth herein) any document or response to discovery which that Party or non- 20 party considers in good faith to contain information (herein referred to as “Confidential 21 || Information”) involving: (a) employment records of any employees or former employees of any 22 || Party; (b) confidential notes, memoranda, and statements regarding non-party employees; (c) 23 || confidential information concerning the discipline and/or termination of non-party employees and 24 || former employees; (d) any document or response to discovery which that party considers in good

1 || faith to contain information subject to protection under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or 2 || Nevada law; (e) medical records, including medical bills and psychological records, and medical 3 || information of any person, whether a Party or non-party to the present litigation; and (f) the name, 4 |\identity, record or personally identifiable information of any student or former student of 5 Defendant Washoe County School District which information is protected by the Family 6 || Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974, 20 U.S.C. §1232g (FERPA) and any other personally 7 ||identifiable information subject to protection under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or

> 8 Nevada law, as “confidential” by stamping the relevant page or as otherwise set forth herein. : 9 || Where a document or response consists of more than one page, the first page and each page on || which confidential information appears shall be so designated. as “confidential” by stamping the

3 E ||relevant page or as otherwise set forth herein. ‘ : 12 1. A Party or non-party may designate information disclosed during a deposition or 23 ||in response to written discovery as “confidential” by so indicating in said response or on the '4 record at the deposition and requesting the preparation of a separate transcript of such material. 5 || Additionally, a Party or non-party may designate in writing, within twenty (20) days after receipt '6 || of said responses or of the deposition transcript for which the designation is proposed, that specific || pages of the transcript and/or specific responses be treated as “confidential” information. Any '8 || other Party may object to such proposal, in writing or on the record. Upon such objection, the 19 || Parties shall follow the procedures described herein below. After any designation made according 20 || to the procedure set forth in this paragraph, the designated documents or information shall be 21 treated according to the designation until the matter is resolved according to the procedures 22 || described herein below, and counsel for all Parties shall be responsible for making all previously 23 || unmarked copies of the designated material in their possession or control with the specified 24 || designation.

] 2. All information produced or exchanged in the course of this case (other than 2 ||information that is publicly available) shall be used by the Party or Parties to whom the 3 || mformation is produced solely for the purpose of this case. 4 3. Except with the prior written consent of other Parties, or upon prior order of this 5 || Court obtained upon notice to opposing counsel, Confidential Information shall not be disclosed 6 || to any person other than: 7 a) Counsel for the respective Parties to this litigation, including in-house

> 8 counsel and co-counsel retained for this litigation; : 9 b) Employees of such counsel; Cc) Individual defendants, class representatives, any officer or employee of a

3 E || Party, to the extent deemed necessary by Counsel for the prosecution or defense of this litigation; ‘ : 12 d) Consultants or expert witnesses retained for the prosecution or defense of 2 || this litigation, provided that each such person shall execute a copy of the Certification annexed to this Order as Exhibit “A” (which shall be retained by counsel to the Party so disclosing the 5 '5 || Confidential Information and made available for inspection by opposing counsel during the '6 || pendency or after the termination of the action only upon good cause shown and upon order of || the Court) before being shown or given any Confidential Information; 8 e) Any authors or recipients of the Confidential Information; 19 f) The Court, Court personnel, and court reporters; and 20 g) Non-party witnesses (other than persons described in paragraph 4(e)). A 21 ||non-party witness (other than persons described in paragraph 4(c) and 4(e)) shall sign the 22 || Certification before being shown a confidential document. Confidential Information may be 23 || disclosed to a non-party witness (other than persons described in paragraph 4(c) and 4(e)) who 24 will not sign the Certification only in a deposition at which the Party who designated the

1 || Confidential Information is represented or has been given notice that Confidential Information 2 ||shall be designated “Confidential”, as set forth herein above. Witnesses shown Confidential 3 || Information shall not be allowed to retain copies. 4 4. If a party wishes to use a document which has been marked as Confidential as an 5 || exhibit to a motion or pleading filed with the Court, the party may do so without seeking that the 6 ||entire document be filed under seal by redacting the “confidential information” from the 7 || document.

> 8 5. Any persons receiving Confidential Information shall not reveal or discuss such 9 || information to or with any person who is not entitled to receive such information, except as set || forth herein.

3 E 6. Unless otherwise permitted by statute, rule or prior court order, papers filed with ‘ : 12 □□□ court under seal shall be accompanied by a contemporaneous motion for leave to file those 2 13 || documents under seal, and shall be filed consistent with the court’s electronic filing procedures '4 || in accordance with Local Rule IA 10-5 and shall also comply with the requirements of Center for 5 || Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1097 (9th Cir. 2016). Notwithstanding any '6 agreement among the Parties, the Party seeking to file a paper under seal bears the burden of || overcoming the presumption in favor of public access to papers filed in court. Kamakana v. City '8 || and County of Honolulu, 447 F.2d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006); Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 19 || 665, 677- 78 (9th Cir. 2010). 20 7.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Lowell M. Birrell
447 F.2d 1168 (Second Circuit, 1971)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Oronoz v. Washoe County School District, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oronoz-v-washoe-county-school-district-nvd-2025.