Ornstein v. Goldberg
226 A.D. 746
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1929·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, without prejudice, however, to defendants to move for such relief as may be appropriate under the circumstances. When defendants were in default in serving their answer, their remedy was a motion to open their default, upon appropriate proof, and not a motion to extend their time to answer. The court had no power to grant the latter relief. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ornstein v. Goldberg, 226 A.D. 746 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).
226 A.D. 746 (Ornstein v. Goldberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Keith v. New York State Teachers' Retirement System
56 A.D.2d 671 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Conklin v. Wilbur
26 A.D.2d 666 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)
Jamaica Savings Bank v. Spiro
206 Misc. 897 (New York County Courts, 1954)