Orndorff v. Mumma
3 H. & J. 70
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court. The court are of opinion, that the plot is a part of the records, and that a copy of it ought to have been annexed to the [71]*71transcript. Ami part of the record only- being produced, was not sufficient evidence to support the action in this s’ase,
JUDGMENT REVERSED, AM) PROCEDENDO AWARDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Orndorff v. Mumma, 3 H. & J. 70 (Md. 1810).
3 H. & J. 70 (Orndorff v. Mumma) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mundy v. Jacques
81 A. 289 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1911)