Orndorff v. Mumma
3 H. & J. 70
This text of 3 H. & J. 70 (Orndorff v. Mumma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Orndorff v. Mumma, 3 H. & J. 70 (Md. 1810).
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court. The court are of opinion, that the plot is a part of the records, and that a copy of it ought to have been annexed to the [71]*71transcript. Ami part of the record only- being produced, was not sufficient evidence to support the action in this s’ase,
JUDGMENT REVERSED, AM) PROCEDENDO AWARDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mundy v. Jacques
81 A. 289 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1911)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 H. & J. 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orndorff-v-mumma-md-1810.