Orme v. State

112 So. 297, 93 Fla. 519
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 14, 1927
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 112 So. 297 (Orme v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Orme v. State, 112 So. 297, 93 Fla. 519 (Fla. 1927).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ of certiorari issued herein is quashed on the authority of Ellis v. State, — Fla. — , 109 South. Rep. 622; State ex rel. Stillman v. Merritt, 86 Fla. 164, 99 South. Rep. 230; Haile v. Gardner, 82 Fla. 355, 91 South. Rep. 376; Carroll v. United States, 267 U. S. 132, 45 Sup. Ct. Rep. 280, 39 A. L. R. 790; American Ry. Express Co. v. Weatherford, 86 Fla, 626, 98 South. Rep. 820; Leonardy v. City of Sanford, 90 Fla. 191, 105 South. Rep. 339; Parker v. City of Sanford, 90 Fla. 132, 105 South. Rep. 154.

Writ of Certiorari quashed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atlantic Shell Co. v. Welded Steel Products Co.
122 So. 787 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 So. 297, 93 Fla. 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orme-v-state-fla-1927.