Orme v. State
This text of 112 So. 297 (Orme v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The writ of certiorari issued herein is quashed on the authority of Ellis v. State, — Fla. — , 109 South. Rep. 622; State ex rel. Stillman v. Merritt, 86 Fla. 164, 99 South. Rep. 230; Haile v. Gardner, 82 Fla. 355, 91 South. Rep. 376; Carroll v. United States, 267 U. S. 132, 45 Sup. Ct. Rep. 280, 39 A. L. R. 790; American Ry. Express Co. v. Weatherford, 86 Fla, 626, 98 South. Rep. 820; Leonardy v. City of Sanford, 90 Fla. 191, 105 South. Rep. 339; Parker v. City of Sanford, 90 Fla. 132, 105 South. Rep. 154.
Writ of Certiorari quashed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 So. 297, 93 Fla. 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orme-v-state-fla-1927.