Orly G. v. Sagi G.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Orly G. v. Sagi G.

117 A.D.3d 648, 986 N.Y.S.2d 335

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 29, 2014

StatusPublished

This text of 117 A.D.3d 648 (Orly G. v. Sagi G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Orly G. v. Sagi G., 117 A.D.3d 648, 986 N.Y.S.2d 335 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Jaffe, J.), entered July 11, 2013, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court properly determined that issues of fact precluded dismissal of plaintiff’s claim that defendant, her brother, fraudulently induced her to transfer her interest in their family business to him for a fraction of its value, and her related claims (see generally Lama Holding Co. v Smith Barney, 88 NY2d 413, 421 [1996]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Friedman, Saxe and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Jaffe, J.), entered July 11, 2013, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court properly determined that issues of fact precluded dismissal of plaintiff’s claim that defendant, her brother, fraudulently induced her to transfer her interest in their family business to him for a fraction of its value, and her related claims (see generally Lama Holding Co. v Smith Barney, 88 NY2d 413, 421 [1996]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Friedman, Saxe and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 A.D.3d 648, 986 N.Y.S.2d 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orly-g-v-sagi-g-nyappdiv-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack