Orlino v. 2 Gold, LLC

63 A.D.3d 541, 880 N.Y.S.2d 479
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 18, 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael D. Stallman, J.), entered March 10, 2009, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant’s motion for summary judgment was properly granted, given that the lumber over which plaintiff tripped at his work site was not “debris,” but an integral part of the work being performed (see 12 NYCRR 23-1.7 [e] [2]; O’Sullivan v IDI Constr. Co., Inc:, 28 AD3d 225, 226 [2006], affd 7 NY3d 805 [2006]; Harvey v Morse Diesel Intl., 299 AD2d 451 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 508 [2003]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Nardelli, Catterson, Renwick and Richter, JJ. [See 2009 NY Slip Op 30516(G).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orlino v. 2 Gold, LLC, 63 A.D.3d 541, 880 N.Y.S.2d 479 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

63 A.D.3d 541 (Orlino v. 2 Gold, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Saginor v. Friars 50th St. Garage, Inc.
2018 NY Slip Op 8067 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)