Orlianzo v. DeFinis

106 N.E.2d 417, 329 Mass. 762, 1952 Mass. LEXIS 739
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMay 28, 1952
StatusPublished

This text of 106 N.E.2d 417 (Orlianzo v. DeFinis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Orlianzo v. DeFinis, 106 N.E.2d 417, 329 Mass. 762, 1952 Mass. LEXIS 739 (Mass. 1952).

Opinion

Orders denying jury issues affirmed. These are appeals from orders of the Probate Court denying jury issues in the matter of proof of the will of Constanzi DeFinis. The only issue argued is that of undue influence. Viewing the whole record and giving the decision of the probate judge the weight to [763]*763which it appears to be entitled, we think that the expected evidence did not require the framing of that issue. The underlying principles have been recently restated. Laws v. Aschenbeck, 326 Mass. 7, 11. Flynn v. Prindeville, 327 Mass. 266. Morin v. Morin, 328 Mass. 33, 34.

Henry Reinherz & Morris Fulman, for the contestant Daniel DeFinis. John J. Crimmins, for the contestant Angelo Bazutto. Maurice Palais, for the petitioner.

The case was submitted on briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morin v. Morin
101 N.E.2d 362 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1951)
Laws v. Aschenbeck
92 N.E.2d 592 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1950)
Flynn v. Prindeville
98 N.E.2d 267 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 N.E.2d 417, 329 Mass. 762, 1952 Mass. LEXIS 739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orlianzo-v-definis-mass-1952.