Orlando v. Town of Oyster Bay
This text of 51 A.D.2d 553 (Orlando v. Town of Oyster Bay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to declare a certain zoning ordinance confiscatory and unconstitutional, plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered February 19, 1975, after a nonjury trial, which declared the said ordinance of the Town of Oyster Bay valid and constitutional as applied to plaintiffs’ property. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Special Term properly found that plaintiffs failed to meet their burden of proving that application of the ordinance to the subject premises is arbitrary and unreasonable (see Williams v Town of Oyster Bay, 32 NY2d 78; Walton v Incorporated Town of Smithtown, 43 AD2d 980, affd 37 NY2d 915. Rabin, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Margett and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 A.D.2d 553, 378 N.Y.S.2d 734, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orlando-v-town-of-oyster-bay-nyappdiv-1976.