Orlando Sports Stadium, Inc. v. Sentinel Star Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Orlando Sports Stadium, Inc. v. Sentinel Star Co.

273 So. 2d 83, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7221

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 8, 1973

DocketNo. 72-449

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 273 So. 2d 83 (Orlando Sports Stadium, Inc. v. Sentinel Star Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Orlando Sports Stadium, Inc. v. Sentinel Star Co., 273 So. 2d 83, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7221 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon a careful review of the record in this case and an analysis of the applicable authorities we conclude that the application for disqualification was sufficient as a matter of law to require disqualification of the trial judge. State v. Parks, 1939, 141 Fla. 516, 194 So. 613; Mank v. Hendrickson, Fla.App.1967, 195 So.2d 574; Brewton v. Kelly, Fla.App.1964, 166 So.2d 834; State v. Cannon, Fla.App.1964, 166 So.2d 625; Dickenson v. Parks, 1932, 104 Fla. 577, 140 So. 459; Crosby v. State, Fla.1957, 97 So.2d 181; State v. Dewell, 1938, 131 Fla. 566, 179 So. 695; Vaughn v. State, Fla.App.1969, 226 So.2d 443. Cf. Hahn v. Frederick, Fla.1953, 66 So.2d 823. Having determined that an order of disqualification should have been entered it follows that the judgments and orders of the trial court entered subsequent thereto were without authority. Crosby v. State, supra; Vaughn v. State, supra.

Accordingly, the order denying suggestion for disqualification and all judgments and orders subsequent thereto including the [84]*84final judgment are hereby vacated and set aside. The cause is remanded for the1 entry of an order of disqualification and reassignment in accordance with appropriate procedure and for such further action as is consistent herewith.

Reversed and remanded.

WALDEN, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon a careful review of the record in this case and an analysis of the applicable authorities we conclude that the application for disqualification was sufficient as a matter of law to require disqualification of the trial judge. State v. Parks, 1939, 141 Fla. 516, 194 So. 613; Mank v. Hendrickson, Fla.App.1967, 195 So.2d 574; Brewton v. Kelly, Fla.App.1964, 166 So.2d 834; State v. Cannon, Fla.App.1964, 166 So.2d 625; Dickenson v. Parks, 1932, 104 Fla. 577, 140 So. 459; Crosby v. State, Fla.1957, 97 So.2d 181; State v. Dewell, 1938, 131 Fla. 566, 179 So. 695; Vaughn v. State, Fla.App.1969, 226 So.2d 443. Cf. Hahn v. Frederick, Fla.1953, 66 So.2d 823. Having determined that an order of disqualification should have been entered it follows that the judgments and orders of the trial court entered subsequent thereto were without authority. Crosby v. State, supra; Vaughn v. State, supra.

Accordingly, the order denying suggestion for disqualification and all judgments and orders subsequent thereto including the [84]*84final judgment are hereby vacated and set aside. The cause is remanded for the1 entry of an order of disqualification and reassignment in accordance with appropriate procedure and for such further action as is consistent herewith.

Reversed and remanded.

WALDEN, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 So. 2d 83, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orlando-sports-stadium-inc-v-sentinel-star-co-fladistctapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack