Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Orlando Sentinel v. White

Orlando Sentinel v. White

691 So. 2d 1110, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2525, 1997 WL 121165
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 19, 1997
DocketNo. 94-3643
StatusPublished

This text of 691 So. 2d 1110 (Orlando Sentinel v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Orlando Sentinel v. White, 691 So. 2d 1110, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2525, 1997 WL 121165 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

MOTION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER ON ATTORNEY’S FEES

PER CURIAM.

We find no abuse of discretion in the conduct of the proceedings below, see Metropolitan Dade County v. Bermudez, 648 So.2d 197, 199 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), or in the amount of the award of appellate attorney’s fees. See generally Crittenden Orange Blossom Fruit v. Stone, 514 So.2d 351 (Fla.1987); Spaulding v. Albertson’s, Inc., 610 So.2d 721 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, DAVIS and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Metropolitan Dade County v. Bermudez
648 So. 2d 197 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Spaulding v. Albertson's, Inc.
610 So. 2d 721 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Crittenden Orange Blossom Fruit v. Stone
514 So. 2d 351 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
691 So. 2d 1110, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2525, 1997 WL 121165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orlando-sentinel-v-white-fladistctapp-1997.