Orlando Regional Healthcare System v. Tiznado

787 So. 2d 977, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9127, 2001 WL 726332
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 29, 2001
DocketNo. 1D00-1978
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 787 So. 2d 977 (Orlando Regional Healthcare System v. Tiznado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Orlando Regional Healthcare System v. Tiznado, 787 So. 2d 977, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9127, 2001 WL 726332 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation case, we strike, as premature, those portions of the order of the Judge of Compensation Claims providing for treatment if deemed reasonable and medically necessary. See Gulf Life Ins. Co. v. Gennell, 666 So.2d 1017, 1018 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). We affirm the remaining issues on appeal. Ac[978]*978cordingly, the order on appeal is AFFIRMED as amended herein.

ERVIN, KAHN, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Orlando Regional Healthcare System v. Tiznado
804 So. 2d 1267 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
787 So. 2d 977, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9127, 2001 WL 726332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orlando-regional-healthcare-system-v-tiznado-fladistctapp-2001.