Orlando Regional Healthcare System v. Tiznado
787 So. 2d 977, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9127, 2001 WL 726332
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 29, 2001·No. No. 1D00-1978·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
In this workers’ compensation case, we strike, as premature, those portions of the order of the Judge of Compensation Claims providing for treatment if deemed reasonable and medically necessary. See Gulf Life Ins. Co. v. Gennell, 666 So.2d 1017, 1018 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). We affirm the remaining issues on appeal. Ac[978]*978cordingly, the order on appeal is AFFIRMED as amended herein.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Orlando Regional Healthcare System v. Tiznado, 787 So. 2d 977, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9127, 2001 WL 726332 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
787 So. 2d 977 (Orlando Regional Healthcare System v. Tiznado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Orlando Regional Healthcare System v. Tiznado
804 So. 2d 1267 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)