Orlando Regional Healthcare System v. Tiznado
This text of 787 So. 2d 977 (Orlando Regional Healthcare System v. Tiznado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this workers’ compensation case, we strike, as premature, those portions of the order of the Judge of Compensation Claims providing for treatment if deemed reasonable and medically necessary. See Gulf Life Ins. Co. v. Gennell, 666 So.2d 1017, 1018 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). We affirm the remaining issues on appeal. Ac[978]*978cordingly, the order on appeal is AFFIRMED as amended herein.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
787 So. 2d 977, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9127, 2001 WL 726332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orlando-regional-healthcare-system-v-tiznado-fladistctapp-2001.