Orlando-Orange County Expressway Authority v. Diversified Services, Inc.
This text of 283 So. 2d 876 (Orlando-Orange County Expressway Authority v. Diversified Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal by Orlando-Orange County Expressway Authority, plaintiff below, from a final judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict in an eminent domain proceeding. It is the contention of the condemning authority that the testimony by the defendant landowner about the asking prices for properties comparable to the subject property was erroneously admitted into evidence and was prejudicial to the plaintiff.1
In light of this court’s recent decision in Rice v. City of Fort Lauderdale, Fla.App.1973, 281 So.2d 36, as applied to the facts of this case we are of the opinion that there is merit to the plaintiff’s contentions. In Rice, we cited with approval the comments in Nichols on Eminent Domain, 3d ed., vol. 5, Sec. 21.4(3), holding, in part:
“If evidence of the price of similar land is to be admitted, the rule is firmly established that it must be confined to the amount actually paid in a completed transaction. Mere offers whether made by the owner of such land or to him, are inadmissible. . . .” (Emphasis added.)
Accordingly, the final judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
283 So. 2d 876, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orlando-orange-county-expressway-authority-v-diversified-services-inc-fladistctapp-1973.