Orlando Mendez, Inc. v. Bechara
This text of 454 So. 2d 45 (Orlando Mendez, Inc. v. Bechara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this workers’ compensation case, the employer/carrier appeal an order of the deputy commissioner which, based on change of condition, modifies a prior order and awards permanent total disability. We find that the testimony of claimant and Dr. Lusskin provides competent, substantial evidence that claimant has suffered an unanticipated change of condition subsequent to the entry of the prior order and that the claimant’s condition is related to the industrial accident. We also find competent, substantial evidence to support the finding of the deputy commissioner that the claimant’s work search was adequate. Appellants, in essence, ask this court to reweigh the evidence and come to a different conclusion than the deputy commissioner on factual issues. See, e.g., McClinton v. Royal Moving & Storage, 435 So.2d 965 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).
Whether the deputy commissioner’s personal observations of claimant, stated in the order sub judice, constitute a sufficient basis for modification of the prior order is an issue we need not reach since the deputy commissioner’s conclusions in the order sub judice are supported by medical evidence.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
454 So. 2d 45, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1701, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orlando-mendez-inc-v-bechara-fladistctapp-1984.