Orkin v. Wilson

246 A.D. 785

This text of 246 A.D. 785 (Orkin v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Orkin v. Wilson, 246 A.D. 785 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Plaintiff Lena Orkin sued to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as the result of a collision between the automobile in which she was riding, owned by-defendant Wolf, and the automobile owned by defendant Wilson. Plaintiff Abe Orkin, her husband, sued to recover for medical expenses and loss of services. On appeal by defendant Wilson, order setting aside verdict in his favor and granting a new trial affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty and Johnston, JJ., concur. Davis, J., dissents and votes for reversal on the ground that it was clearly a question of fact as to the negligence of defendant Wilson, with the preponderance of the evidence in his favor. Under the circumstances the verdict should stand. (Dashnau v. City of Oswego, 204 App. Div. 189, 192; Leversee v. Neidermyer, 219 id. 214.) On appeal by defendant Wolf, order setting aside verdict in his favor and granting a new trial unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Davis and Johnston, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dashnau v. City of Oswego
204 A.D. 189 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 A.D. 785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orkin-v-wilson-nyappdiv-1935.